

Misconceptions - Statistics
Something here may be what is holding back your students' learning in mathematics.
Keep in mind that mistakes are made by some students but misconceptions are made by many students (and sometimes even teachers). Misconceptions happen repeatedly because students believe they are correct.
Addition
Misconception 1: Keep in mind that students need to work in a concrete-pictorial-abstract order to best learn, retain and apply their mathematics. Students need to understand the different uses for the “=” sign, e.g. 4+1=5, where the “=” sign indicates that the right side of the number sentence contains 'the answer' and should be read to mean 'equals', compared to a statement of equality such as 4+1=3+2, where the “=” sign should be read to mean 'is the same as'. It is important to present number sentence problems to students horizontally e.g. 34+49=This assists students in reading the numbers from left to right and will develop understanding of place value and how to read numbers. This will also provide students with opportunities to look at the whole number, not just the digits, assisting students with estimating the solution.
Misconception 2: Jump strategy: Incomplete understanding of place value; for example, thinking 16 + 10 = 1610, and using inefficient strategies, such as counting on by ones, and ending up with a wrong answer due to miscounting.
Misconception 3: Relying on counting on by ones for addition instead of using more efficient strategies. Difficulty tracking counting when adding more than two quantities together. Difficulty with problems that require addition of more than two values; in the early years, the focus is largely on problems of the form known + known = unknown and students may not be used to seeing an addition problem set out differently from this.Place value errors when 'trading' the ten when using an algorithm to solve the problem.
Misconception 4: Estimation is just calculating badly on purpose. Estimation isn’t a second-class intellectual citizen. It doesn’t need charity from calculation. It needs teachers who appreciate its value, who can create tasks that help students experience its benefits.
Misconception 5: Over-specialisation. The student has over-specialised their knowledge of addition facts and restricted it to “fact tests” or one particular problem format, e.g. the student completes addition facts assessments satisfactorily but does not apply the knowledge to other arithmetic and problem-solving situations. The student has overspecialised during the learning process so that they recognise some addition situations as addition but fails to classify other addition situations appropriately.
Misconception 6: The commutative and associative properties are not applied elsewhere. The student may know the commutative property of addition but fails to apply it to simplify the “work” of addition or misapplies it in subtraction situations, e.g. states that 9 + 4 = 13 with relative ease, but struggles to find the sum of 4 + 9. The student may know the associative property of addition but fails to apply it to simplify the “work” of addition, e.g. A student struggles to find the sum of three or more numbers, such as 4 + 7 + 6, using a rote procedure, because they fail to recognise that it is much easier to add the numbers in a different order.
Misconception 7: I’ve always done it this way. The student tries to overgeneralise basic addition or subtraction methods, instead of developing more efficient methods. The student may be unable to generalise methods that they already know for adding to a new situation, e.g. Student may be perfectly comfortable with addition facts, such as 6 + 7, but does not know how to extend this fact knowledge to an algorithm, such as 16 + 7. Students need to understand the different uses for the = sign, e.g. 24 + 21 = 45, where the = sign indicates that the right side of the number sentence contains 'the answer' and should be read to mean 'equals', compared to a statement of equality such as 14 + 11 = 13 + 12, where the = sign should be read to mean 'is the same as'.
Misconception 8: I have to present my working as an algorithm. Number lines and diagrams are all methods of justifying answers so unless you are explicitly wanting an algorithm, any logical justification is quite acceptable.
Subtraction
Misconception 1: We spend a lot of time teaching addition then after that, teach subtraction, usually spending a lot less time. We are then surprised when students revert to addition when faced with a subtraction. Overcome this common misconception by teaching the part-part-whole model; where the underlying model of both addition and subtraction are clear. This is much better than rushing through, doing examples with bigger and bigger numbers. It means students deeply understand how subtraction and addition fit together. It is more powerful if a student really understands that 5 – 2 = 3 and how this relates to 3 + 2 =5 and 5 – 3 = 2 and 2 + 3 = 5 than if a student can do equations with numbers to 20.
Misconception 2: Students believe the values of the equation are written in the same order as given, e.g. 78 minus 35 becomes 78 – 35 but the issue arises when a statement like this is given: Subtract 35 from 78.
Misconception 3: The bigger number is always the minuend.
Misconception 4: Students may think that because addition is commutative, then subtraction is, which it is not, e.g.
5 - 3 does not equal 3 - 5 but 5 + 3 = 3 + 5.
Misconception 5: Addition and Subtraction are not connected. One of the big issues that occurs in the learning of subtraction is when the student sees addition and subtraction as discrete and separate operations. Their conception of the operations does not include the fact that they are linked as inverse operations, e.g.The student has difficulty mastering subtraction facts because they do not link them to addition facts. They may know that 6 + 7 = 13 but fail to realise that this fact also tells them that 13 – 7 = 6. The student can add 36 + 16 = 52 but cannot use addition to help estimate a difference, such as 52 – 36, or check the difference once it has been computed.
Misconception 6: I can add and subtract. The student knows how to add and/or subtract, but does not know when to add or subtract when problem solving.
Multiplication
Misconception 1: Skip counting: Ensure students are repeatedly adding the same value i.e. when skip counting by twos, students are not getting confused and start to count by ones or threes etc. Students may think that skip counting patterns must always increase. (Model a decreasing skip count pattern even though the content descriptor states ‘starting from zero’.) Students can skip count - but really they have just rote memorising and will not be able to transfer the skills later. Skip counting is connected to multiplicative thinking and must be taught with meaning.
Misconception 2: Jump strategy: Incomplete understanding of place value; for example, thinking 16 + 10 = 1610, and Using inefficient strategies, such as counting on by ones, and ending up with a wrong answer due to miscounting.
Misconception 3: Be aware of the language of grouping, the number IN each group is different to the number OF groups.
Misconception 4: Repeated addition is not multiplication. Multiplication of natural numbers certainly gives the same result as repeated addition but that does not make it the same. Addition requires identical units. The sum must always have the same units as the addends:
2 apples + 3 apples = 5 apples 2 apples + 3 oranges = ??
What does that second equation give you? Fruit salad? In order to add quantities with unlike units, we need to find a common denominator. Apples and oranges are both pieces of fruit, so…
2 apples + 3 oranges = 2 pieces of fruit + 3 pieces of fruit
= 5 pieces of fruit
Multiplication requires different units. The product does not have the same units as either the multiplier or the multiplicand,
e.g. 2 baskets × 3 apples per basket = 6 apples
How can we make multiplication come out the same as repeated addition? The only way to do it is to change the units.
How should we teach it? Change the focus from how to why. We can teach multiplication in much the same way that we do now, using manipulatives arranged in groups, rows, diagrams and arrays. But instead of drawing our students’ attention to the process of adding up the answer, we want to focus on the fact that the items are arranged in equal sized blocks. In other words, we teach our students to recognise the multiplicand.
Misconception 5: Word problems - I don’t need to draw a diagram - that’s childish. This is often a belief held by older students in Primary and it is one that we must remove, by simply putting value on diagrams. Diagrams are acceptable working and must be presented.
Misconception 6: You have to teach the tables to ten - the whole she-bang! Neuroscience will tell you that this is not the case with the diminishing chunking memory. Students will learn the multiplication facts in the following order:
-
0 and 1 times table;
-
2 times table;
-
3 times table;
-
10 times table;
-
5 times table;
Why? Students learn the easiest facts first that connect to the prior learning. By the time they reach the more ‘difficult’ tables, there will be very few to learn.
Misconception 7: Assuming multiplication always results in a larger value. Because students initially learn that multiplication is repeated addition, it makes sense that students generalise that the product of two values will always be greater than both of the multipliers. This assumption only holds true with positive whole numbers. Decimals, fractions and negative values contradicts this assumption.
Misconception 8: Multiplying numbers in the order they are listed. Multiplication is like addition in that it is commutative. A deep understanding of the commutative property assists students in mental calculations. Consider the 5 x 13 x 2. Using the commutative property successfully, students could multiply 5 and 2 first, resulting in 10, then multiply by 13.
Misconception 9: Just add zeros when multiplying by a power of 10. Students who accept the shortcut of ‘when you multiply by a power of 10, just add that many zeros onto the number being multiplied’ without a true understanding of the underlying mathematics often apply this rule incorrectly. It works for integers, but not decimals.
Misconception 10: 27 x 3 = 20 x 3 + 7 x 3 ← Where did the "+" come from? Students often don't understand the concept of expanded notation which is to their detriment in multiplying larger numbers.
Misconception 11: Be very careful with just listing terms that ‘mean’ multiplication. Taken out of context can sometimes be confusing for students.
Division
Misconception 1: It is important that students are made aware that it is not always appropriate nor is it always possible to interpret division as equal sharing. For example, 8 ÷ 0·2 or 8 ÷ both become nonsense if interpreted as equal sharing because the number of groups into which items are shared would not be a whole number. Thus, in equal sharing situations, the divisor must be a whole number and less than the dividend and, consequently, the quotient will be smaller than the dividend. This early equal sharing strategy is not as straightforward as it may appear because the child has to keep track of the order of the cycle of distribution as well as deciding if there are enough left at the end of each cycle in order to distribute another object to each group or person.
Misconception 2: There are two different structures for division and this can confuse students:
Sharing (partitive division) - dividing a number into a known number of groups. Also known as fair share division since you are dividing up the quantity evenly amongst each group:
Comes from years of sharing out food, lollies, pencils, etc. When we divide 8 into 2 groups and we want to determine how many items each group will have.
Grouping (quotative division) - dividing a number into groups of a measured quantity. Also known as measured division since you have already measured the quantity of each resulting group
When we divide 8 into groups of 2, we want to determine how many groups that will make.
​Teachers often use different conceptions of division and switch between the languages of each without thinking about the confusion it may cause for the students. The term ‘sharing’ is partitive division and students have had years of experience of sharing out food, objects, pencils, etc. Division by grouping (quotative division) is not such a familiar concept and is harder to visualise and understand, when we divide 8 into 2 groups and we want to determine how many items each group will have. Division in this context is the inverse of multiplication therefore uses grouping, e.g. for 35 ÷ 5, students need to think how many groups of 5 there are in 35, NOT how 35 can be shared between 5 people.
Misconception 3: The term ‘leftover’ is used until Year 4 where ‘remainders’ is introduced. At times, a student can lack an understanding of WHAT the leftover actually represents. Students need to see calculations in concrete situations.
Misconception 4: Division makes the answer smaller: It is a very common misconception that division in maths makes the number smaller. This idea is understandable and a part of a healthy number sense when you’re talking about whole numbers but as soon as students begin work with fractions and decimals then the misconception will cause problems.
Misconception 5: Factors and Multiples - which one is which? Students often confuse the two. Use the language to clarify - factor has the word ‘fact’ within it. So factors are numbers ‘within’ the given number.
Misconception 6: The term ‘mental computation’ - students think that they can only calculate in their heads. It must be emphasised that when using a mental strategy, making notes is helpful and the method remains a mental strategy.
Misconception 7: Students do not connect multiplication and division as inverse operations.The student sees multiplication and division as discrete and separate operations. We are reducing cognitive load when we build a strong connection between the inverse operations.
Misconception 8: Students often confuse the words ‘halving’ and ‘doubling’.
Misconception 9: Students think that larger numbers will always have more factors.
Misconception 10: The "Sharing problem" - Students often don’t get questions such as “How many 3s are in 7?” They often revert to sharing which causes confusion. This causes even greater problems when students revert back to sharing when dividing larger numbers. It is vital that we use manipulatives to support the understanding of grouping so students move towards abstract methods with a strong, conceptual understanding of why the method works. Division with Remainders - Beth Smith, Primary Maths Specialist, White Rose Maths.
​